7 jaren 3 maanden geleden - 7 jaren 3 maanden geleden #42430 door katertje
De Russische krant Pravda schrijft dat Rusland satellietfoto’s zal publiceren waaruit blijkt dat de Amerikaanse overheid betrokken was bij de terroristische aanslagen op 11 september 2001.

De Pravda schrijft: Amerikaanse deskundigen zijn van mening dat, ondanks het feit dat de betrekkingen tussen de VS en Rusland hun grootste dieptepunt hebben bereikt sinds de Koude Oorlog, Poetin slechts voor kleine problemen zorgt voor Obama. Analisten menen dat dit een “stilte voor de storm” is. Poetin gaat één keer slaan, maar dan slaat hij ook hard. Rusland is bezig met de voorbereiding van het vrijgeven van bewijs van betrokkenheid van de Amerikaanse regering en de inlichtingendiensten bij de aanslagen van 11 september. De lijst van bewijzen bevat ook satellietbeelden.

Het gepubliceerde materiaal kan de medeplichtigheid van de Amerikaanse overheid bij de aanslagen van 9/11 en de succesvolle manipulatie van de publieke opinie bewijzen. De aanval was gepland door de Amerikaanse overheid, maar is bij volmacht uitgevoerd, zodat deze aanval op de mensen van de Verenigde Staten eruit zag als een daad van agressie van het internationale terrorisme.


Dat 9/11 een fals flag is was nagenoeg iedereen bekend, maar of het bericht juist is dat Rusland met bewijzen hiervoor zal komen, moet met enige scepsis worden bezien.
Laast bewerkt: 7 jaren 3 maanden geleden door katertje.
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: Mischa, dirko, gnor

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

7 jaren 7 maanden geleden #41098 door katertje
Interview with former German Defense Minister Von Buelow

{The following interview with Von Buelow appeared in the German
daily }Tagesspiegel,{ on Jan. 13.}

Q: You seem so angry, really upset.

Von Buelow: I can explain what's bothering me: I see that after the horrifying attacks of Sept. 11, all political public opinion is being forced into a direction that I consider wrong.

Q: What do you mean by that?

Von Buelow: I wonder why many questions are not asked. Normally, with such a terrible thing, various leads and tracks appear that are then commented on, by the investigators, the media, the government: Is there something here or not? Are the explanations plausible? This time, this is not the case at all. It already began just hours after the attacks in New York and Washington and--

Q: In those hours, there was horror, and grief.

Von Buelow: Right, but actually it was astounding: There are 26 intelligence services in the U.S.A. with a budget of $30 billion--

Q: More than the German defense budget.

Von Buelow: --which were not able to prevent the attacks. In fact, they didn't even have an inkling they would happen. For 60 decisive minutes, the military and intelligence agencies let the fighter planes stay on the ground, 48 hours later, however, the FBI presented a list of suicide attackers.
Within ten days, it emerged that seven of them were still alive.

Q: What, please?

Von Buelow: Yes, yes. And why did the FBI chief take no position regarding contradictions? Where did the list came from, why it was false? If I were the chief investigator (state attorney) in such a case,I would regularly go to the public, and give information on which leads are valid and which not.

Q: The U.S. government talked about an emergency situation after the attacks: They said they were in a war. Is it not understandable that one does not tell the enemy everything one knows about him?

Von Buelow: Naturally. But a government which goes to war, must first establish who the attacker, the enemy, is.It has a duty to provide evidence. According to its own admission, it has not been able to present any evidence that would hold up in court.

Q: Some information on the perpetrators has been proven with documents. The suspected leader, Mohammad Atta, left Portland for Boston on the morning of Sept. 11, in order to board the plane that later hit the World Trade Center

Von Buelow: If this Atta was the decisive man in the operation, it's really strange that he took such a risk of taking a plane that would reach Boston such a short time before the connecting flight. Had his flight been a few minutes late, he would not have been in the plane that was hijacked. Why should a sophisticated terrorist do this? One can, by the way, read on CNN (Internet) that none of these names were on the official passenger lists.None of them had gone through the check-in procedures. And why did none of the threatened pilots give the agreed-upon code 7700 over the [Steuerknueppel: STEERING NOB?] to the ground station? In addition: The black boxes which are fire and shock proof, as well as the voice recordings, contain no valuable data--

Q: That sounds like--

Von Buelow: --like assailants who, in their preparations leave tracks behind them like a herd of stampeding elephants?
They made payments with credit cards with their own names; they reported to their flight instructors with their own names.
They left behind rented cars with flight manuals in Arabic for jumbo jets. They took with them, on their suicide trip wills and farewell letters, which fall into the hands of the FBI, because they were stored in the wrong place and wrongly addressed. Clues were left like behind like in a child's game of hide-and-seek, which were to be followed!

There is also the theory of one British flight engineer: According to this, the steering of the planes was perhaps taken out of the pilots' hands, from outside.

The Americans had developed a method in the 1970s,whereby they could rescue hijacked planes by intervening into the computer piloting [automatic pilot system]. This theory says, this technique was abused in this case. That's a theory....

Q: Which sounds really adventurous, and was never considered.

Von Buelow: You see! I do not accept this theory, but I find it worth considering. And what about the obscure stock transactions? In the week prior to the attacks, the amount of transactions in stocks in American Airlines,United Airlines, and insurance companies, increased 1,200%. It was for a value of $15 billion. Some people must have known something. Who?

Q: Why don't you speculate on who it might have been.

Von Buelow: With the help of the horrifying attacks,the Western mass democracies were subjected to brainwashing.The enemy image of anti-communism doesn't work any more; it is to be replaced by peoples of Islamic belief. They are accused of having given birth to suicidal terrorism.

Q: Brainwashing? That's a tough term.

Von Buelow: Yes? But the idea of the enemy image doesn't come from me. It comes from Zbigniew Brzezinski and Samuel Huntington, two policy-makers of American intelligence and foreign policy. Already in the middle of he 1990s, Huntingon believed, people in Europe and the U.S.needed someone they could hate--this would strengthen their identification with their own society. And Brzezinski, the mad dog, as adviser to President Jimmy Carter, campaigned for the exclusive right of the U.S. to seize all the raw materials of the world, especially oil and gas.

Q: You mean, the events of Sept. 11--

Von Buelow: --fit perfectly in the concept of the armaments industry, the intelligence agencies, the whole militar industrial-academic complex. This is in fact conspicuous. The huge raw materials reserves of the former Soviet Union are now at their disposal, also the pipeline routes and--

Q: Erich Follach described that at length in {Spiegel}:``It's a matter of military bases, drugs, oil and gas reserves.''

Von Buelow: I can state: the planning of the attacks was technically and organizationally a master achievement. To hijack four huge airplanes within a few minutes and within one hour, to drive them into their targets, with complicated flight manoeuvers! This is unthinkable, without years-long support from secretapparatuses of the state and industry.

Q: You are a conspiracy theorist!

Von Buelow: Yeah, yeah. That's the ridicule heaped [on those raising these questions] by those who would prefer to follow the official, politically correct line. Even investigative journalists are fed propaganda and disinformation. Anyone who doubts that, doesn't have all his marbles! That is your accusation.

Q: Your career actually speaks against the idea that you are not in your right mind. You were already in the 1970s, state secretary in the Defense Ministry; in 1993 you were the SPD [Social Democratic Party] speaker in the Schalk-Golodkowski investigation committee--

Von Buelow: And it all began there! Until that time, I did not have any great knowledge of the work of intelligence agencies. And now we had to take note of a great discrepancy: We shed light on the dealings of the Stasi and other East bloc intelligence agencies in the field of economic criminality, but as soon as we wanted to know something about the activities of the BND [German intelligence]or the CIA, it was mercilessly blocked.
No information, no cooperation, nothing! That's when I was first taken aback.

Q: Schalck-Golodkowski mediated, among other things, various business deals abroad. When you looked at his case more closely--

Von Buelow: We found, for example, a clue in Rostock, where Schalck organized his weapons depot. Well, then we happened upon an affiliation of Schalck in Panama, and then we happened upon Manuel Noriega, who was for many years President, drug dealer, and money launderer, all in one, right?
And this Noriega was also on the payroll of the CIA,for $200,000 a year.These were things that really made me curious.

Q: You wrote a book on the dealings of the CIA and Co.In the meantime, you have become an expert regarding the strange things related to intelligence services' work.

Von Buelow: ``Strange things'' is the wrong term. What has gone on, and goes on, in the name of intelligence services, are true crimes.

Q: What would you say determines the work of intelligence services?

Von Buelow: So that we don't have any misunderstandings: I find that it makes sense to have intelligence services....

Q: You don't think much of the earlier proposals by the Greens, who wanted to dismantle these agencies?

Von Buelow: No. It is right to take a look behind the scenes. Getting intelligence about the intentions of an enemy, makes sense. It is important when one tries to put oneself into the mind of the enemy. Whoever wants to understand the CIA's methods, has to deal with its main tasks, {covert operations}: below the level of war, and outside international law,
foreign states are to be influenced, by organizing insurrections,terrorist attacks, usually combined with drugs and weapons trade, and money laundering. This is essentially very simple: One arms violent people with weapons.
Since, however, it must not under any circumstances come out, that there is an intelligence agency behind it, all traces are erased, with tremendous deployment of resources.

I have the impression that this kind of intelligence agency spends 90% of its time this way: creating false leads. So that, if anyone suspects the collaboration of the agencies, he is accused of the sickness of conspiracy madness.The truth often comes out only years later. CIA chief Allen Dulles once said: In case of doubt, I would even lie to the Congress!

Q: The American journalist Seymour M. Hersh, wrote in the {New Yorker,} that even some people in the CIA and government assumed, that certain leads had been laid in order to confuse the investigators. Who, Herr von Buelow, would have done this?

Von Buelow: I don't know that either. How should I? I simply use my common sense, and--
See: The terrorists behaved in such a way to attract attention. And as practicing Muslims, they were in a strip-tease bar, and, drunken, stuck dollar bills into the panty of the dancer.

Q: Things like that also happen.

Von Buelow: It may be. As a lone fighter,I cannot prove anything, that's beyond my capabilities. I have real difficulties, however, to imagine that all this all sprung out ofthe mind of an evil man in his cave.

Q: Mr. von Buelow, you yourself say that you are alone in your criticism. Formerly, you were part of the political establishment, now you are an outsider.

Von Buelow: That is a problem sometimes, but one gets used to it. By the way, I know a lot of people, including very influential ones, who agree with me, but only in whispers, never publicly.

Q: Do you still have contact with old SPD companions, such as Egon Bahr and former Chancellor Helmut Schmidt?

Von Buelow: There are no close contacts any more. I wanted to go to the last SPD party congress, but I was sick.

Q: Can it be, Mr. von Buelow, that you are a mouthpiece for typical anti-Americanism?

Von Buelow: Nonsense, this has absolutely nothing to do with anti-Americanism. I am a great admirer of this great, open, free society, and always have been. I studied in the U.S.

Q: How did you get the idea that there could be a link between the attacks and the American intelligence agencies?

Von Buelow: Do you remember the first attack on the WorldTrade Center in 1993?

Q: Six people were killed and over a thousand wounded, by a bomb explosion.

Von Buelow: In the middle was the bombmaker,a former Egyptian officer. He had pulled together some Muslims for the attack. They were snuck into the country by the CIA,despite a State Department ban on their entry. At the same time, the leader of the band was an FBI informant.

And he made a deal with the authorities:At the last minute, the dangerous explosive material would be replaced by a harmless powder. The FBI did not stick to the deal.The bomb exploded, so to speak, with the knowledge of the FBI. The official story of the crime was quickly found: The criminals were evil Muslims.

Q: At the time Soviet soldiers marched into Afghanistan, you were in the cabinet of Helmut Schmidt. What was it like?

Von Buelow: The Americans pushed for trade sanctions, they demanded the boycott of the Olympic games in Moscow....

Q.... which the German government followed...

Von Buelow: And today we know: It was the strategy of the American security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, to destabilize the Soviet Union from neighboring Muslim countries, They lured the Russians into Afghanistan, and then prepared for them a hell on earth, their Vietnam. With decisive support of the U.S. intelligence agencies,at least 30,000 Muslim fighters were trained in Afghanistan and Pakistan, a bunch of good-for-nothings and fanatics who were, and still are today, ready for anything. And one of them is Osama bin Laden. I wrote years ago: ``It was out of this brood, that the Taliban grew up in Afghanistan, who had been brought up in the Koran schools financed by American and Saudi funds, the Taliban who are now terrorizing the country and destroying it

Q: Even though you say, for the U.S. it was a matter of raw materials in the region, the starting point for the U.S. aggression, was the terrorist attack which cost thousands of human lives.

Von Buelow: Completely true. One must always keep this gruesome act in mind. Nonetheless, in the analysis of political processes, I am allowed to look and see who has advantages and disadvantages, and what is coincidental. When in doubt, it is always worthwhile to take a look at a map, where are raw materials resources, and the routes to them? Then lay a map of civil wars and conflicts on top of that--they coincide. The same is the case with the third map: nodal points of the drug trade.

Where this all comes together, the American intelligence servicesare not far away. By the way, the Bush family is linked to oil, gas, and weapons trade, through the bin Laden family.

Q: What do you think of the Bin Laden films?

Von Buelow: When one is dealing with intelligence services,one can imagine manipulations of the highest quality.Hollywood could provide these techniques. I consider the videos inappropriate as evidence.

Q: You believe the CIA is capable of anything, [wouldn't stop at anything].

Von Buelow: The CIA, in the state interests of the U.S.,does not have to abide by any law in interventions abroad,is not bound by international law; only the President gives orders.

And when funds are cut, peace is on the horizon, then a bomb explodes somewhere. Thus it is proven,that you can't do without the intelligence services; and that the critics are {nuts,} as Father Bush called them, Bush who was once CIA head and President. You have to see that the U.S. spends $30 billionon intelligence services, and $13 billion on anti-drug work.
And what comes out of it? The chief of a special unit of the strategic anti-drug work declared, in despair, after 30 years of service, that in every big, important drug case, the CIA came in and took it out of my hands. (Rosalinda: Michael Levin)

Q: Do you criticize the German government for its reaction after Sept. 11?

Von Buelow: No. To assume that the government were independent in these questions, would be naive.

Q: Herr von Buelow, what will you do now?

Von Buelow: Nothing. My task is concluded by saying, it could not have been that way [according to the official story]

Search for the truth!
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: gnor

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

7 jaren 8 maanden geleden - 7 jaren 8 maanden geleden #41047 door katertje
De waarheid omtrent 9/11 bereikt eindelijk de MSM!

Ongekend 9/11 C-SPAN VIDEO: 9/11 WAARHEID verschijnt eindelijk in de mainstream media!

Video van Richard Gage van Architecten en Ingenieurs voor 9/11 Waarheid over de ineenstorting van gebouw 7 van het World Trade Center Complex. Vernietigend omdat de gezaghebbende wetenschap aantoont dat het 9/11 Commissie Rapport FRAUDE is.
Compromitterend en explosief voor de echte daders en de hele natie.

Een website met méér HIEROVER .. (...LINK, klik erop om het hele artikel te lezen..)

Laast bewerkt: 7 jaren 8 maanden geleden door dirko.
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: dirko, gnor

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

  • dirko
  • dirko's Profielfoto
  • Offline
  • Spammer
  • Spammer
  • Als iets niet kan, kan het tóch. Overste Ranft.
7 jaren 9 maanden geleden #40630 door dirko
Zonder woorden..:


De draad geheel kwijt. Soms Bang, maar altijd Olufsen.!!
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: Mischa, katertje, gnor

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

7 jaren 11 maanden geleden #40373 door katertje
Een ontmoeting uit januari 2012 net voor de presidentsverkiezingen in Rusland? Daarna is er wel het een en ander gebeurd.

In februari 2013 zei Kissinger:

“De Verenigde Staten heeft China en Rusland onder controle. De laatste nagel aan de doodskist zal Iran zijn, dat natuurlijk het voornaamste doelwit van Israël is. We hebben het China toegestaan dat ​​het militair kon groeien en we hebben Rusland van het Sovjet tijdperk laten herstellen, om hen een vals gevoel van bravoure te geven. Dit zal zorgen voor hun snelle ondergang. We zijn net als die scherpschutter die de ander het geweer laat oppakken en zodra de ander iets probeert zullen wij raak schieten. De komende oorlog zal zo hevig zijn, dat er slechts één supermacht kan winnen en die supermacht zullen wij zijn, de Verenigde Staten. Dat is de reden waarom de EU zo haastig probeert om een superstaat te vormen, ze weten wat er gaat komen en om te overleven, zal Europa ook één staat moeten worden. Hun gevoel van urgentie vertelt mij ​​dat ze weten hoe laat het is. O, wat heb ik gedroomd van dit heerlijke moment."

Interview Global Research.
Bron: Wij worden wakker.
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: dirko, gnor

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

7 jaren 11 maanden geleden - 7 jaren 8 maanden geleden #40372 door OranjevrijStaat
Dat doet Putin alleen maar als hij daar toestemming voor krijgt en na overleg met zijn oude vrind Heinz Kissinger.

Laast bewerkt: 7 jaren 8 maanden geleden door dirko.
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: dirko, gnor

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

7 jaren 11 maanden geleden - 7 jaren 11 maanden geleden #40361 door katertje
Waarheid of fictie? De website Want to Know komt met het bericht dat Vladimir Putin de onterechte beschuldigingen aan het adres van Rusland over Oekraine spuugzat is en de VS een toontje lager wil doen zingen door te dreigen met Russische satellietbeelden te komen die keihard aantonen dat 9/11 een INSIDE JOB is.

Lees een gedeelte uit het lange verhaal:

Nu de spanningen tussen de VS en Rusland op een ongekende hoogte zijn aan- gekomen, vergelijkbaar met de barre tijden van de Koude Oorlog in de jaren 1960 – 1980, lijkt het erop dat Vladimir Poetin het helemaal gehad heeft met de gladde praatjes van Obama, die Rusland in de hoek zetten van agressor.

Volgens sommige analisten zou het zomaar ineens kunnen dat Poetin, om meteen maar een troefkaart op tafel te gooien in deze onderlinge strijd, bewijsmateriaal zou kunnen gaan vrijgeven, waaronder bijvoorbeeld satellietbeelden, waaruit keihard zou blijken dat 9/11 de ‘valse-vlag’-operatie IS, waar iedereen over spreekt. Behalve dan natuurlijk de officiële kanalen.

In een poging om de overheid in dit verhaal te ontmaskeren, waarbij zij haar eigen burgers vermoorden, om elders te gaan moorden, hebben sommigen al vaak gedreigd om militaire details te onthullen, die deze wreedheden van de VS in het daglicht zet. Daarbij vallen steeds vaker speculaties op, die melden dat Vladimir Poetin in besloten kring gezegd zou hebben, dat er satellietbeelden in het bezit van de Russische regering zijn, die ZONDER ENIGE TWIJFEL keihard aantonen, dat de VS het slachtoffer was op 11 september 2011, van een ‘valse-vlag-operatie’..!

En natuurlijk weet Poetin wat hij doet, het is een kolfje naar zijn hand, als manipulatief-getrainde oud-KGB-geheim-agent..! De repercussies zouden enorm zijn voor de VS, de betrokken officials zouden onder dermate grote druk komen, dat er zomaar een nationale opstand zou kunnen plaatsvinden. Al het vertrouwen en het geloof in de huidige Amerikaanse overheid zou volledig uit elkaar vallen en er zouden zeker heftige onlusten optreden in de straten van de grote Amerikaanse steden.

En stel je daarbij voor hoe de VS op het wereldtoneel haar masker ziet vallen; een prooi wordt voor daadwerkelijke moslim-extremisten die vergelding zoeken. Of een buitenlandse mogendheid, zoals China bijvoorbeeld, die een heimelijke staatsgreep zou kunnen orchestreren. We gaan het binnenkort daadwerkelijk zien of Poetin deze heftige troefkaart durft uit te spelen op het internationale speelveld van politieke wereldmachten.

GAAT PUTIN DE BOM ONDER DE 9/11 SCAM LEGGEN ? .. (...LINK, klik erop om te hele artikel te lezen..)

Laast bewerkt: 7 jaren 11 maanden geleden door dirko.
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: Mischa, dirko, gnor

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

  • dirko
  • dirko's Profielfoto
  • Offline
  • Spammer
  • Spammer
  • Als iets niet kan, kan het tóch. Overste Ranft.
8 jaren 5 maanden geleden #38507 door dirko
Het Consensuspanel 11 September is blij aan te kunnen kondigen dat hun website in zijn geheel is vertaald in het Nederlands,

Het streven van het Consensuspanel 11 September is de wereld een duidelijke verklaring te verschaffen, gebaseerd op de onafhankelijke mening van experts, aangaande het meest duidelijke bewijs dat haaks staat op de officiële lezing over 11 september.

een paar quotes uit de inhoud:

Punt TT-3: Een Bewering Die Explosies in de Twin Towers Uitsluiten

De Officiële Lezing

NIST schreef alsof niemand – inclusief leden van de brandweer van New York – getuigenverklaringen heeft gegeven van explosies in de Twin Towers.[1]

Het Beste Bewijs

Meer dan 100 van de ruwweg 500 leden van de FDNY (Fire Department New York) die ter plaatse waren hebben melding gemaakt[2] van wat zij beschrijven als explosies in de Twin Towers.
Vergelijkbare meldingen[3] werden gedaan door journalisten, politieagenten en werknemers van het WTC.

Referenties voor punt TT-3

NIST, “Answers to Frequently Asked Questions,” 30 Augustus 2006, Vraag 2.

Graeme MacQueen, “118 Witnesses: The Firefighters’ Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers,” Journal of 9/11 Studies, Vol. 2/Augustus 2006, 47-106.
Verslagen van journalisten, politieagenten, WTC werknemers zijn samengebracht in: David Ray Griffin, “Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories,”, 18 Januari 2006

De link naar de bedoelde website (klik hier)


De draad geheel kwijt. Soms Bang, maar altijd Olufsen.!!
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: katertje

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

8 jaren 6 maanden geleden - 8 jaren 6 maanden geleden #38025 door katertje
Vooraanstaande journalisten: ‘9/11 was een hoax, overheid liegt’

Verschillende vooraanstaande Amerikaanse journalisten zeggen dat hun overheid liegt over 9/11 en de zogenaamde oorlog tegen het terrorisme.
Mediabedrijven en redacteurs geven deze journalisten echter geen ruimte om hun bevindingen te publiceren.

Onlangs zei onderzoeksjournalist Seymour Hersh dat de aanval op Osama bin Laden op 2 mei 2011 ‘een grote leugen’ was. Hersh bekritiseerde zijn oude werkgever The New York Times en andere grote mediabedrijven: “We liegen over alles.” Hij zei dat alle grote Amerikaanse mediabedrijven geen bestaansrecht hebben omdat ze de mensen voorliegen.

Hersh krijgt bijval van andere gerenommeerde journalisten, die menen dat de Amerikaanse overheid liegt over Osama bin Laden en 9/11. Journalist Sherwood Ross, die onder meer schreef voor de Chicago Daily News en persbureau Reuters, zei tijdens een recent radio-interview:

Het is onwaarschijnlijk dat moslims achter 9/11 zaten. Denk hier eens over na: de familie van president Bush deed zaken met de familie van Osama bin Laden, de man die achter de terroristische aanslag zou zitten. De familie van Bin Laden zat in de bestuursraad van het oliebedrijf van Bush. Hoe is het mogelijk dat nu juist die familie, die zaken doet met de president van de Verenigde Staten, de aanslagen heeft gepleegd? Het lijkt me niet dat 9/11 een Arabische of islamitische samenzwering was. Ik denk dat het een Amerikaans complot is om de regering van de VS te vervangen voor een politiestaat, de imperialistische ambities van het land na te streven en de energievoorraaden in het Midden-Oosten uit te putten.

Ross legde uit dat Amerikaanse journalisten niet langer mogen publiceren over leugens en verzinsels:

De mainstream media zetten vrijwel nergens vraagtekens bij. Voor mij werd duidelijk dat 9/11 een inside job was toen een cameraman van een lokale krant in Pennsylvania naar de plek ging waar op 11 september 2001 een vliegtuig zou zijn neergestort. Hij zei: “Ik zag geen vliegtuig. Ik zag alleen een gat in de grond. Ik zag geen lichamen. Ik zag geen bagage.” Vervolgens werd gezegd dat het Pentagon zou zijn geraakt door een vliegtuig. Opnieuw werd nooit een wrak gevonden. Journalisten die werkzaam waren in de Press Room van het Pentagon stonden buiten en konden geen vliegtuig zien. Je ziet steeds vaker dat de pers geen melding maakt van leugens en verzinsels.

Toen hij voor Reuters werkte moest hij dit soort uitspraken voor zich houden. “Toen ik voor Reuters schreef werden mijn blogs overgenomen door veel kranten, van de The New York Times tot de Los Angeles Times,” zei Ross. “Maar als je dingen schrijft als ‘Waarom stortte 7 World Trade Center in terwijl het gebouw nooit is geraakt door een vliegtuig?’, wordt het artikel door niemand overgenomen.”

Ook de vooraanstaande Amerikaanse journalist Paul Craig Roberts mag de waarheid over 9/11 niet verspreiden via de Amerikaanse reguliere pers. Dr. Roberts was staatssecretaris van Financiën onder Ronald Reagan en schreef onder andere voor de Wall Street Journal en Business Week. Sinds hij zich openlijk uitspreekt over de gecontroleerde sloop van de wolkenkrabbers op 9/11 worden zijn stukken niet meer gepubliceerd.

Roberts legt uit waarom de Amerikaanse media liegen over alles. President Clinton liet toe dat vijf grote bedrijven de Amerikaanse media domineren, waardoor de onafhankelijkheid van de media is verdwenen. De media worden niet langer aangestuurd door journalisten, maar door grote marketingbazen. Voor hen draait alles om de federale uitzendlicenties. Vandaar dat ze de overheid te vriend willen houden. Als de licenties worden ingetrokken lopen ze vele miljarden mis. De mainstream media zijn niet langer de media. Ze vertellen je niets. Het is een ministerie van propaganda geworden.

“De neoconservatieven, die voorstander zijn van de hegemonie van Amerika, riepen op tot een ‘nieuwe Pearl Harbor’ om een oorlog te kunnen beginnen,” zei Roberts. “Er is geen bewijs voor de officiële versie van de gebeurtenissen op 9/11.”

Net zoals Seymour Hersh, Sherwood Ross, Paul Craig Roberts en steeds meer anderen beseffen, is het motto van de reguliere media nu: “Wij liegen over alles.”


Laast bewerkt: 8 jaren 6 maanden geleden door dirko.
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: dirko

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

  • dirko
  • dirko's Profielfoto
  • Offline
  • Spammer
  • Spammer
  • Als iets niet kan, kan het tóch. Overste Ranft.
8 jaren 10 maanden geleden - 8 jaren 7 maanden geleden #37007 door dirko
Wat mij het meest heeft verbaasd is dta beij de planecrash met de 'heros' onboard, zowel als bij een van de twintowerss, vrijwel meteen nade gebeurtenissen slightly light roasted 'hijackers' passports were found... susrprisingly in good shape. isnt it weard ? It stinks !
The hole in the Pentagon and the jet fan, found and photographed right after the impact, was not of one part that fits into a commuter of that size.... It is a G.Missile part I know, as many people that saw the rotor admitted it was in particular tha rotor of a guided missile.

It stinks.
And, if ever, the lid gets of we will be Knocked OUT 100% by the stench, odour and facts.

For me, it is a SCAM, the biggest SCAM ever. Provide me proof CLEAR to the contrary, such as all the security tapes, moments for the ecvents.
They all- yes ALL got disappread. That on itself is the BEST PROOF OF THE FACT IT IS ! AS SCAMN.



De draad geheel kwijt. Soms Bang, maar altijd Olufsen.!!
Laast bewerkt: 8 jaren 7 maanden geleden door dirko.
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: katertje

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

8 jaren 10 maanden geleden #37002 door katertje
More than 11 years after the catastrophic destruction of the World Trade Center, New York City’s government is finally asking: What in the world could have happened to the missing 1,116 victims?

In every building collapse in history, all of the victims’ bodies have been recovered more or less intact. That is because falling buildings crush human bodies. They do not shred them into tiny pieces, or cause them to vanish into thin air.

Yet on September 11th, 2001, the most famous “building collapses” in history somehow caused the bodies of more than 1,000 victims to magically disappear. Not even a shred of skin, a fragment of fingernail, or a shard of bone from any of these bodies was ever recovered, despite meticulous “sifting and bucketing” efforts.

But that’s not the only mystery. Hardly anything was left of the 1,634 WTC occupants who did not completely vanish. Most of the human remains discovered and DNA-identified were in the form of tiny, shredded pieces, not intact bodies.

What happened to the nearly 3,000 human bodies that were annihilated during the ten-second disappearances of the 110-story Towers? Answer: The same thing that happened to the office furniture, filing cabinets, telephones, computers, and other contents of the Towers. Virtually no remains of these objects were ever recovered, either. They - like the human bodies - were somehow transformed into a mixture of tiny shards and sub-100-micron dust, which floated out to sea and slowly settled into the Atlantic. As one of the sifters-and-bucketers remarked, the biggest piece of office furniture recovered from Ground Zero was a tiny fragment of a telephone keypad.

Now, more than 11 years later, the New York City government is finally acknowledging the mystery. In a memo to the 9/11 victims’ families, NYC official Casey Holloway announced that this Monday, April 1st, the city’s Chief Medical Examiner will begin sifting through 60 truckloads of World Trade Center construction debris at Fresh Kills Landfill on Staten Island. The city says it hopes to find remains of at least some of the 1,116 missing victims.

Unfortunately, the chances of finding remains of more than a few additional victims seem remote. After all, the Twin Towers debris - which amounted to less than 50% of the mass of the Towers (what happened to the rest of the mass?) - was already meticulously sifted and bucketed more than a decade ago. The city’s decision to sift through recent construction debris beginning April 1st bears more than a passing resemblance to George W. Bush’s decision
to get down on his hands and knees to look under his desk for the missing Iraqi WMD. Is this some kind of cruel April Fools’ Day joke?
The absence of crushed-but-intact human bodies, office furniture and equipment, and 50% of the Towers’ mass suggests that the Twin Towers did not collapse - they exploded. (See the Youtube film “North Tower Exploding.”) This would explain why tiny human bone fragments were discovered scattered all over the roof of the neighboring Deutsche Bank building in 2006. No simple gravitational collapse, like the one posited by US government’s official NIST Report, could possibly blast human skeletons to smithereens and deposit those smithereens all over the roof of a neighboring building.
Were the Twin Towers, and the thousands of people inside them, blown to bits by explosives? That is what many of the 9/11 victims’ family members believe. Robert McIlvaine, whose son Bobby was murdered in the Twin Towers on 9/11, has stated that roughly half the family members share his suspicion that the Towers were explosively demolished in a false-flag attack. William Rodriguez, the famous 9/11 hero who has spoken to hundreds of thousands of people around the world, is another representative of the 9/11 survivors who asserts that the evidence for “controlled demolition” is an open secret.

Scientist Carl Sagan once pointed out that “absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” But sometimes absence of evidence IS a smoking gun. The absence of intact bodies, office contents, and half of the mass of the Twin Towers is a smoking gun proving that the Towers were explosively demolished.

The missing contents and mass of the Twin Towers are not the only mysterious “absence” connected with 9/11. Other notable “missing evidence” includes:

* The absence of the US government’s 80-plus videos of the attack on the Pentagon, some of which were confiscated by FBI agents just moments after the attack. Only a few frames have been released, and those frames show an explosion at the Pentagon but no big airliner.

* The absence of the 100,000 kilos of Boeing 757 airliner that supposedly entered the Pentagon. No record exists of those 100,000 kilos of airliner debris, or the plane’s luggage and passenger remains, ever being removed from any of the three widely-separated damaged areas of the Pentagon.

* The absence of the 100,000 kilos of Boeing 757 airliner that supposedly buried itself in the soft earth beneath a shallow fifteen-foot-diameter crater in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. There is no evidence of 100,000 kilos of airliner debris, along with passenger remains and luggage, being recovered from beneath the ground at the alleged crash site.

* The absence of the official airline passenger lists, security video footage, ticket stubs, testimony from airline employees, or any other actual evidence that the 19 young Arabs blamed for 9/11 were even on the planes.

* The absence of the audio recordings of FAA personnel debriefing each other about what they experienced on 9/11. These recordings were confiscated by an FAA supervisor and shredded into tiny pieces, which were discarded into many widely-separated trash receptacles so they could never be collected and reconstructed.

* The absence of the indestructible “black boxes” of the planes that hit the Twin Towers. The US government claims these flight data recorders were never recovered, but first responders say they were present when they were found and taken away by FBI agents.

* The absence of the government’s most important cited evidence: The audio and video recordings of the lengthy torture sessions and scripted false confessions of mentally-retarded “9/11 mastermind” Abu Zubaydah and his fellow “mastermind” Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. The CIA admits that it illegally destroyed these recordings, anonymous second-hand reports of which are cited in the 9/11 Commission Report as its only evidence for the 19-hijackers scenario.

* The absence of any plausible innocent explanation for the BBC’s premature report of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, Larry Silverstein’s confession that he demolished WTC-7, and (of course) the obvious controlled demolition of that building.

In every one of these cases - as in the case of the 1,116 missing victims - the absence of evidence is a smoking gun.

The US government now faces a complete absence of legitimacy.
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: tukker, dirko

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

  • dirko
  • dirko's Profielfoto
  • Offline
  • Spammer
  • Spammer
  • Als iets niet kan, kan het tóch. Overste Ranft.
8 jaren 10 maanden geleden #36834 door dirko
The vid doesnt ring a bell, it rings a dozen of Church-carillons...


De draad geheel kwijt. Soms Bang, maar altijd Olufsen.!!
De volgende gebruiker (s) zei dank u: katertje, ilse

Gelieve Inloggen om deel te nemen aan het gesprek.

Moderators: dirko